-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.5k
Polish #1938
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Polish #1938
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ | |
|
||
/** | ||
* {@link org.springframework.cache.Cache} implementation on top of a | ||
* {@link javax.cache.Cache} instance. | ||
* {@link Cache javax.cache.Cache} instance. | ||
* | ||
* <p>Note: This class has been updated for JCache 1.0, as of Spring 4.0. | ||
* | ||
|
@@ -42,15 +42,15 @@ public class JCacheCache extends AbstractValueAdaptingCache { | |
|
||
|
||
/** | ||
* Create an {@link org.springframework.cache.jcache.JCacheCache} instance. | ||
* Create a {@link org.springframework.cache.jcache.JCacheCache} instance. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The package name starts with an "o". Thus this is grammatically correct. Please undo this change. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @sbrannen "a" is intended for the rendered link in Javadoc, "JCacheCache", not "org.springframework.cache.jcache.JCacheCache". Am I missing something? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hmmm.... good question! I believe we (i.e., the collective core Spring Team) were thinking that the fully qualified class name (FQCN) shows up in the generated HTML when linked via FQCN. So, if that's not the case, that would mean there is a larger issue across the entire code base in the core Spring Framework, since we routinely use "an" instead of "a" in such cases. Perhaps it's better to address that nuanced feature of Javadoc in a dedicated JIRA issue. @snicoll, thoughts? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @sbrannen thanks. Could you please raise a SPR issue for this? I got caught as well and I am wondering if that's not a new feature of javadoc or something (or I've been wrong this all time). There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Indeed! I am also wondering if this was a change to how Javadoc works in a recent release (perhaps in JDK 8?). And well... if you've been wrong this whole time, so have I and many others. 😉 I'll raise a JIRA issue to track this. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
* @param jcache backing JCache Cache instance | ||
*/ | ||
public JCacheCache(Cache<Object, Object> jcache) { | ||
this(jcache, true); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Create an {@link org.springframework.cache.jcache.JCacheCache} instance. | ||
* Create a {@link org.springframework.cache.jcache.JCacheCache} instance. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The package name starts with an "o". Thus this is grammatically correct. Please undo this change. |
||
* @param jcache backing JCache Cache instance | ||
* @param allowNullValues whether to accept and convert null values for this cache | ||
*/ | ||
|
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ public T process(MutableEntry<Object, Object> entry, Object... arguments) throws | |
} | ||
catch (Exception ex) { | ||
throw new EntryProcessorException("Value loader '" + valueLoader + "' failed " + | ||
"to compute value for key '" + entry.getKey() + "'", ex); | ||
"to compute value for key '" + entry.getKey() + "'", ex); | ||
} | ||
entry.setValue(toStoreValue(value)); | ||
return value; | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Without the fully qualified package name, we'd want to have "JCache" there in addition.
So we might as well just leave it as is for clarity, as was originally intended.
Thus, please either undo this change or prefix that with "JCache" as is done elsewhere in the Javadoc for this class.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sbrannen It looks the same concern as @snicoll 's #1938 (comment). I answered there and let me know what you think.