Skip to content

Add generic blackbox monitoring configuration #1028

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh force-pushed the generic-blackbox branch 2 times, most recently from eba14f9 to d9187c4 Compare April 12, 2024 19:26
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh requested a review from markgoddard April 15, 2024 10:21
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2024 10:21
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2024 10:21
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh changed the base branch from stackhpc/yoga to stackhpc/2023.1 April 23, 2024 10:01
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh force-pushed the generic-blackbox branch 2 times, most recently from a3432dc to e7b4a9e Compare April 23, 2024 10:52
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh marked this pull request as draft April 23, 2024 10:52
@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member Author

Marked as draft as recent changes are untested

@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh force-pushed the generic-blackbox branch 3 times, most recently from b244f26 to 1150cc7 Compare May 1, 2024 09:14
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2024 09:14
@Alex-Welsh Alex-Welsh force-pushed the generic-blackbox branch 3 times, most recently from 16dc469 to 562affb Compare May 1, 2024 12:10
Copy link
Member

@dougszumski dougszumski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not opposed to merging this as-is, but it would be good to investigate the file based service discovery approach I mentioned upstream. We should be able to do something similar downstream, but using Kayobe to write out the service discovery file(s) instead of the KA roles.

@bbezak
Copy link
Member

bbezak commented Jun 12, 2024

is it ready to merge? it would be good to define blackbox exporter defaults

@Alex-Welsh
Copy link
Member Author

is it ready to merge? it would be good to define blackbox exporter defaults

From the monitoring R&D discussion, we're going to proceed with this style downstream, and investigate file based discovery upstream

Copy link
Member

@dougszumski dougszumski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good stuff @Alex-Welsh

@dougszumski dougszumski merged commit 84e7994 into stackhpc/2023.1 Jun 28, 2024
12 checks passed
@dougszumski dougszumski deleted the generic-blackbox branch June 28, 2024 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants