Skip to content

fix: [#474] return raw_user_info_from_provider in get_user_info in gi… #553

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mavwolverine
Copy link
Contributor

…thub

Summary of change

(A few sentences about this PR)

Related issues

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work. Bonus points for screenshots and videos!)

Documentation changes

(If relevant, please create a PR in our docs repo, or create a checklist here highlighting the necessary changes)

Checklist for important updates

  • Changelog has been updated
  • coreDriverInterfaceSupported.json file has been updated (if needed)
    • Along with the associated array in supertokens_python/constants.py
  • frontendDriverInterfaceSupported.json file has been updated (if needed)
  • Changes to the version if needed
    • In setup.py
    • In supertokens_python/constants.py
  • Had installed and ran the pre-commit hook
  • Issue this PR against the latest non released version branch.
    • To know which one it is, run find the latest released tag (git tag) in the format vX.Y.Z, and then find the latest branch (git branch --all) whose X.Y is greater than the latest released tag.
    • If no such branch exists, then create one from the latest released branch.
  • If have added a new web framework, update the supertokens_python/utils.py file to include that in the FRAMEWORKS variable
  • If added a new recipe that has a User type with extra info, then be sure to change the User type in supertokens_python/types.py
  • Make sure that syncio / asyncio functions are consistent.
  • If access token structure has changed
    • Modified test in tests/sessions/test_access_token_version.py to account for any new claims that are optional or omitted by the core

Remaining TODOs for this PR

  • Item1
  • Item2

@mavwolverine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Couldn't get the tests to run on arm Mac. So making this into draft pull request.
If someone could run the tests and verify, would be great.


result = UserInfo(
third_party_user_id=str(user_info.get("id")),
email=None,
raw_user_info_from_provider=raw_user_info_from_provider,
)

for info in email_info:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look fine to me. please update changelog and version.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changelog updated

@namsnath
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mavwolverine,
I'm closing this PR out in favor of #558.
Added some additional changes there on top of the ones you suggested here, and added you as a co-author.

Thanks a lot for the contribution!

@namsnath namsnath closed this Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants