Skip to content

[lldb] Fix that SIGWINCH crashes IOHandlerEditline when we are not us… #1411

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

fredriss
Copy link

@fredriss fredriss commented Jul 2, 2020

…ing the editline backend

Summary:
TerminalSizeChanged is called from our SIGWINCH signal handler but the
IOHandlerEditline currently doesn't check if we are actually using the real
editline backend. If we're not using the real editline backend, m_editline_up
won't be set and IOHandlerEditline::TerminalSizeChanged will access
the empty unique_ptr. In a real use case we don't use the editline backend
when we for example read input from a file. We also create some temporary
IOHandlerEditline's during LLDB startup it seems that are also treated
as non-interactive (apparently to read startup commands).

This patch just adds a nullptr check form_editline_up as we do in the rest of
IOHandlerEditline.

Fixes rdar://problem/63921950

Reviewers: labath, friss

Reviewed By: friss

Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81729

(cherry picked from commit be18df3)

…ing the editline backend

Summary:
TerminalSizeChanged is called from our SIGWINCH signal handler but the
IOHandlerEditline currently doesn't check if we are actually using the real
editline backend. If we're not using the real editline backend, `m_editline_up`
won't be set and `IOHandlerEditline::TerminalSizeChanged` will access
the empty unique_ptr. In a real use case we don't use the editline backend
when we for example read input from a file. We also create some temporary
IOHandlerEditline's during LLDB startup it seems that are also treated
as non-interactive (apparently to read startup commands).

This patch just adds a nullptr check for`m_editline_up` as we do in the rest of
IOHandlerEditline.

Fixes rdar://problem/63921950

Reviewers: labath, friss

Reviewed By: friss

Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81729

(cherry picked from commit be18df3)
@fredriss fredriss merged commit f298ef4 into swiftlang:apple/stable/20200108 Jul 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants