Skip to content

[lldb] Print SWIFTC in the Make invocation #2239

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2020
Merged

[lldb] Print SWIFTC in the Make invocation #2239

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2020

Conversation

JDevlieghere
Copy link

Don't pass SWIFTC through the environment but rather make it part of the
Make invocation. This makes it possible to reproduce the Make step by
copying the invocation.

rdar://68730409

@JDevlieghere
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci please test

@JDevlieghere
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci please test linux platform

Don't pass SWIFTC through the environment but rather make it part of the
Make invocation. This makes it possible to reproduce the Make step by
copying the invocation.

rdar://68730409
@JDevlieghere
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci please test

@@ -973,8 +973,6 @@ def run_suite():
# Iterating over all possible architecture and compiler combinations.
os.environ["ARCH"] = configuration.arch
os.environ["CC"] = configuration.compiler
if configuration.swiftCompiler:

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does this go away here while CC is still in the environment? Should CC also disappear? I'm just wondering because of the apparent inconsistency.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They've already been removed upstream.

@adrian-prantl
Copy link

Thanks! This was very confusing.

@JDevlieghere JDevlieghere merged commit 41be35f into swiftlang:swift/main Dec 15, 2020
@JDevlieghere JDevlieghere deleted the rdar68730409 branch December 15, 2020 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants