Skip to content

[clang][driver][tooling] Cherry-pick some commits related to dependency scanning #3198

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 26, 2021

Conversation

jansvoboda11
Copy link

No description provided.

Moving `InputInfo.h` from `lib/Driver/` into `include/Driver` to be able to expose it in an API consumed from outside of `clangDriver`.

Reviewed By: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106787
This patch exposes `InputInfo` in `Job` instead of plain filenames. This is useful in a follow-up patch that uses this to recognize `-cc1` commands interesting for Clang tooling.

Depends on D106787.

Reviewed By: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106788
When `-fno-integrated-as` is passed to the Clang driver (or set by default by a specific toolchain), it will construct an assembler job in addition to the cc1 job. Similarly, the `-fembed-bitcode` driver  flag will create additional cc1 job that reads LLVM IR file.

The Clang tooling library only cares about the job that reads a source file. Instead of relying on the fact that the client injected `-fsyntax-only` to the driver invocation to get a single `-cc1` invocation that reads the source file, this patch filters out such jobs from `Compilation` automatically and ignores the rest.

This fixes a test failure in `ClangScanDeps/headerwithname.cpp` and `ClangScanDeps/headerwithnamefollowedbyinclude.cpp` on AIX reported here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103461#2841918 and `clang-scan-deps` failures with `-fembed-bitcode`.

Depends on D106788.

Reviewed By: dexonsmith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105695
This fixes a build failure introduced in 11ee699.
This fixes a build failure introduced in 11ee699.
D31709 added an assertion was added to `FullSourceLoc::hasManager()` that ensured a valid `SourceLocation` is always paired with a `SourceManager`, and missing `SourceManager` is always paired with an invalid `SourceLocation`.

This appears to be incorrect, since clients never cared about constructing `FullSourceLoc` to uphold that invariant, or always checking `isValid()` before calling `hasManager()`.

The assertion started failing when serializing diagnostics pointing into an explicit module. Explicit modules don't have valid `SourceLocation` for the `import` statement, since they are "imported" from the command-line argument `-fmodule-name=x.pcm`.

This patch removes the assertion, since `FullSourceLoc` was never intended to uphold any kind of invariants between the validity of `SourceLocation` and presence of `SourceManager`.

Reviewed By: arphaman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106862
@jansvoboda11
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

@jansvoboda11
Copy link
Author

Failures look unrelated, merging...

@jansvoboda11 jansvoboda11 merged commit 7c934af into stable/20210726 Aug 26, 2021
@jansvoboda11 jansvoboda11 deleted the jan_svoboda/cherry-pick_0 branch August 26, 2021 16:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant