Skip to content

[lldb][import-std-module] Prefer the non-module diagnostics when in f… #3339

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Teemperor
Copy link

…allback mode

The fallback setting for import-std-module is supposed to allow running
expression that require an imported C++ module without causing any regressions
for users (neither in terms of functionality nor performance). This is done by
first trying to normally parse/evaluate an expression and when an error occurred
during this first attempt, we retry with the loaded 'std' module.

When we run into a system with a 'std' module that for some reason doesn't build
or otherwise causes parse errors, then this currently means that the second
parse attempt will overwrite the error diagnostics of the first parse attempt.
Given that the module build errors are outside of the scope of what the user can
influence, it makes more sense to show the errors from the first parse attempt
that are only concerned with the actual user input.

Reviewed By: aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110696

(cherry picked from commit 6fcb857)

…allback mode

The `fallback` setting for import-std-module is supposed to allow running
expression that require an imported C++ module without causing any regressions
for users (neither in terms of functionality nor performance). This is done by
first trying to normally parse/evaluate an expression and when an error occurred
during this first attempt, we retry with the loaded 'std' module.

When we run into a system with a 'std' module that for some reason doesn't build
or otherwise causes parse errors, then this currently means that the second
parse attempt will overwrite the error diagnostics of the first parse attempt.
Given that the module build errors are outside of the scope of what the user can
influence, it makes more sense to show the errors from the first parse attempt
that are only concerned with the actual user input.

Reviewed By: aprantl

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110696

(cherry picked from commit 6fcb857)
@Teemperor Teemperor merged commit 0ba42f1 into swiftlang:stable/20210726 Oct 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant