Skip to content

Add support for "clang.arc.attachedcall" on x86-64 #3527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 11, 2021

Conversation

ahatanaka
Copy link

No description provided.

This is in preparation for another patch I'm planning to send later.

(cherry picked from commit 392a2a5)
that don't use the inline asm marker

This patch makes the changes to the ARC middle-end passes that are
needed to handle operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" on targets that
don't use the inline asm marker for the retainRV/autoreleaseRV
handshake (e.g., x86-64).

Note that anyone who wants to use the operand bundle on their target has
to teach their backend to handle the operand bundle. The x86-64 backend
already knows about the operand bundle (see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D94597).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111334

(cherry picked from commit 8f8d9f7)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808 made clang use the operand bundle
instead of emitting retainRV/claimRV calls on arm64. This commit makes
changes to clang that are needed to use the operand bundle on x86-64.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111331

(cherry picked from commit d61eb6c)
operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" with ObjC runtime functions

The existing code only handles the case where the intrinsic being
rewritten is used as the called function pointer of a call/invoke.

(cherry picked from commit 1fe8993)
@ahatanaka
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci please test

@ahatanaka ahatanaka merged commit e19254f into stable/20210726 Nov 11, 2021
@ahatanaka ahatanaka deleted the attachedcall-x86-64 branch November 11, 2021 01:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant