Fix an over-suspend bug with LaunchInNewTerminalWithAppleScript sessions #616
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix an over-suspend bug with LaunchInNewTerminalWithAppleScript sessions
When launching an inferior in a new terminal window via AppleScript
and the darwin-debug helper program, we could often end up with the
inferior process having a too-high suspend count, and it would never
resume execution.
lldb tries to wait until darwin-debug has finished its work and has
launched the inferior (WaitForProcessToSIGSTOP) but this wasn't
working correctly - and cannot be made to work.
This patch removes WaitForProcessToSIGSTOP, adds a special tiny
segment to the darwin-debug executable so it can be identified as
that binary (ExecExtraSuspend), and adds code to debugserver to
detect this segment. When debugserver sees this segment, it notes
that the next exec will be done with a launch-suspended flag. When
the next exec happens, debugserver forces an extra task_resume when
we resume the inferior.
An alternative approach would be if lldb could detect when the
inferior has been launched by darwin-debug unambiguously; monitoring
when the unix socket between darwin-debug and lldb was closed would
have been a reasonable way to do this too.
rdar://problem/29760580
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72963
(cherry picked from commit 83a131b)