Skip to content

[lldb] Don't scan more than 10MB of assembly insns (#105890) #9184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

jasonmolenda
Copy link

For supported architectures, lldb will do a static scan of the assembly instructions of a function to detect stack/frame pointer changes, register stores and loads, so we can retrieve register values for the caller stack frames. We trust that the function address range reflects the actual function range, but in a stripped binary or other unusual environment, we can end up scanning all of the text as a single "function" which is (1) incorrect and useless, but more importantly (2) slow.

Cap the max size we will profile to 10MB of instructions. There will surely be functions longer than this with no unwind info, and we will miss the final epilogue or mid-function epilogues past the first 10MB, but I think this will be unusual, and the failure more to missing the epilogue is that the user will need to step out an extra time or two as the StackID is not correctly calculated mid-epilogue. I think this is a good tradeoff of behaviors.

rdar://134391577
(cherry picked from commit 3280292)

For supported architectures, lldb will do a static scan of the assembly
instructions of a function to detect stack/frame pointer changes,
register stores and loads, so we can retrieve register values for the
caller stack frames. We trust that the function address range reflects
the actual function range, but in a stripped binary or other unusual
environment, we can end up scanning all of the text as a single
"function" which is (1) incorrect and useless, but more importantly (2)
slow.

Cap the max size we will profile to 10MB of instructions. There will
surely be functions longer than this with no unwind info, and we will
miss the final epilogue or mid-function epilogues past the first 10MB,
but I think this will be unusual, and the failure more to missing the
epilogue is that the user will need to step out an extra time or two as
the StackID is not correctly calculated mid-epilogue. I think this is a
good tradeoff of behaviors.

rdar://134391577
(cherry picked from commit 3280292)
@jasonmolenda jasonmolenda merged commit 7accbab into swiftlang:stable/20240723 Aug 27, 2024
@jasonmolenda jasonmolenda deleted the cp/r134391577-limit-assembly-instruciton-scan2 branch August 27, 2024 22:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant