Skip to content

Revert "[SE-0193] Rename the attributes to their final names" #1502

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2018

Conversation

moiseev
Copy link
Contributor

@moiseev moiseev commented Apr 3, 2018

Reverts #1497 as it caused problems for Linux builds with swift-4.2-branch, where new attributes are not yet available.

corelibs-foundation code should be compatible with both swift-4.2-branch and master branches of the main Swift repo.

@moiseev
Copy link
Contributor Author

moiseev commented Apr 3, 2018

@swift-ci please test and merge

@millenomi
Copy link
Contributor

Noted.

@swift-ci swift-ci merged commit c76e152 into master Apr 3, 2018
@moiseev moiseev deleted the revert-1497-se-0193-renaming branch April 3, 2018 20:39
@ikesyo
Copy link
Member

ikesyo commented Apr 3, 2018

So what is the purpose of the swift-4.2-branch of this repo? I assumed the issue was addressed with swiftlang/swift#15698 and swiftlang/swift#15699.

@ikesyo
Copy link
Member

ikesyo commented Apr 4, 2018

Anyway this could be reverted once the next rebranch of swift-4.2-branch has done I think.

@moiseev
Copy link
Contributor Author

moiseev commented Apr 4, 2018

@ikesyo apparently (and I did not know this when I reverted this PR) there is indeed a separate 4.2-branch for corelibs-foundation, but! there is a catch: there is an automerge set-up that unconditionally applies all the changes from master to the swift-4.2-branch. It should have been enough to simple remove this change in the 4.2 branch alone and not in master. And yes, you're right, once the rebranch happens, we can revert the revert.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants