Skip to content

basic implementation for NSURLResponse init and tests #71

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

cullenbmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cullenbmacdonald cullenbmacdonald force-pushed the implement-nsurlresponse branch 6 times, most recently from a0fe3f0 to 568b75a Compare December 8, 2015 18:27
@cullenbmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor Author

Does this look ok or should we swap the interface to use public let?

@cullenbmacdonald cullenbmacdonald force-pushed the implement-nsurlresponse branch 4 times, most recently from 8b55c4a to 7d5e97a Compare December 9, 2015 03:19
@phausler
Copy link
Contributor

phausler commented Dec 9, 2015

looks good to me; after seeing the style of public private(set), I think perhaps it might be something we should adopt in places that don't have side effects or locks instead of using ivars

@cullenbmacdonald
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cool. So are you saying that this is the right implementation here?

@phausler
Copy link
Contributor

phausler commented Dec 9, 2015

yea - it seems like a pretty reasonable pattern in many cases (not just this one)

phausler added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2015
basic implementation for NSURLResponse init and tests
@phausler phausler merged commit 742880b into swiftlang:master Dec 9, 2015
atrick pushed a commit to atrick/swift-corelibs-foundation that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2021
[build-script] Add build-script-helper.py
kateinoigakukun pushed a commit to kateinoigakukun/swift-corelibs-foundation that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2021
add a test case for an invalid optimization
kateinoigakukun pushed a commit to kateinoigakukun/swift-corelibs-foundation that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants