Skip to content

Refactor to rely less on global state for failure reporting #33

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2016
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions Sources/XCTest/XCTAssert.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ private enum _XCTAssertion {

private func _XCTAssert(@autoclosure expression: () -> BooleanType, @autoclosure assertion: () -> _XCTAssertion, @autoclosure _ message: () -> String, file: StaticString, line: UInt) {
if !expression().boolValue {
if let test = XCTCurrentTestCase {
test.testFailure(message(), failureDescription: assertion().failureDescription, expected: true, file: file, line: line)
if let handler = XCTFailureHandler {
handler(XCTFailure(message: message(), failureDescription: assertion().failureDescription, expected: true, file: file, line: line))
}
}
}
Expand Down
37 changes: 18 additions & 19 deletions Sources/XCTest/XCTestCase.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,8 +34,18 @@ extension XCTestCase {
var unexpectedFailures = 0
let overallDuration = measureTimeExecutingBlock {
for (name, test) in tests {
XCTCurrentTestCase = self
let method = "\(self.dynamicType).\(name)"

var failures = [XCTFailure]()
XCTFailureHandler = { failure in
if !self.continueAfterFailure {
failure.emit(method)
fatalError("Terminating execution due to test failure", file: failure.file, line: failure.line)
} else {
failures.append(failure)
}
}

print("Test Case '\(method)' started.")

setUp()
Expand All @@ -45,21 +55,19 @@ extension XCTestCase {
tearDown()

totalDuration += duration
for failure in XCTCurrentFailures {
for failure in failures {
failure.emit(method)
totalFailures += 1
if !failure.expected {
unexpectedFailures += 1
}

let result = failures.count > 0 ? "failed" : "passed"

print("Test Case '\(method)' \(result) (\(printableStringForTimeInterval(duration)) seconds).")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this is a regression that causes "passed" to never be output.

Before, the following line appeared outside of the XCTCurrentFailures loop:

print("Test Case '\(method)' \(result) (\(printableStringForTimeInterval(duration)) seconds).")

Now, it appears within the failures for loop. As a result, only the results of failing tests are printed.

XCTAllRuns.append(XCTRun(duration: duration, method: method, passed: failures.count == 0, failures: failures))
}
var result = "passed"
if XCTCurrentFailures.count > 0 {
result = "failed"
}
print("Test Case '\(method)' \(result) (\(printableStringForTimeInterval(duration)) seconds).")
XCTAllRuns.append(XCTRun(duration: duration, method: method, passed: XCTCurrentFailures.count == 0, failures: XCTCurrentFailures))
XCTCurrentFailures.removeAll()
XCTCurrentTestCase = nil
XCTFailureHandler = nil
}
}

Expand All @@ -75,15 +83,6 @@ extension XCTestCase {
print("Executed \(tests.count) test\(testCountSuffix), with \(totalFailures) failure\(failureSuffix) (\(unexpectedFailures) unexpected) in \(printableStringForTimeInterval(totalDuration)) (\(printableStringForTimeInterval(overallDuration))) seconds")
}

// This function is for the use of XCTestCase only, but we must make it public or clients will get a link failure when using XCTest (23476006)
public func testFailure(message: String, failureDescription: String, expected: Bool, file: StaticString, line: UInt) {
if !continueAfterFailure {
assert(false, message, file: file, line: line)
} else {
XCTCurrentFailures.append(XCTFailure(message: message, failureDescription: failureDescription, expected: expected, file: file, line: line))
}
}

public func setUp() {

}
Expand Down
4 changes: 1 addition & 3 deletions Sources/XCTest/XCTestMain.swift
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -66,7 +66,5 @@ internal struct XCTRun {
exit(totalFailures > 0 ? 1 : 0)
}

internal var XCTCurrentTestCase: XCTestCase?
internal var XCTCurrentFailures = [XCTFailure]()
internal var XCTFailureHandler: (XCTFailure -> Void)?
internal var XCTAllRuns = [XCTRun]()