Skip to content

[Explicit Module Builds] Add API to specify richer external target module details #779

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2021

Conversation

artemcm
Copy link
Contributor

@artemcm artemcm commented Jul 30, 2021

Specifically, whether an external target moduel is a framework. This is required to pass this information down to the compiler in order to generate correct auto-linking directives.

Part of rdar://81177797

…dule details

Specifically, whether an external target moduel is a framework. This is required to pass this information down to the compiler in order to generate correct auto-linking directives.

Part of rdar://81177797
@artemcm artemcm requested a review from nkcsgexi July 30, 2021 20:40
@artemcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

artemcm commented Jul 30, 2021

@swift-ci please test

Copy link
Contributor

@nkcsgexi nkcsgexi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense. Thank you for fixing this!

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ let package = Package(
name: "SwiftDriver",
dependencies: ["SwiftOptions", "SwiftToolsSupport-auto",
"CSwiftScan", "Yams"],
exclude: ["CMakeLists.txt"]),
exclude: ["CMakeLists.txt", SwiftDriver.docc]),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This broke the build because "SwiftDriver.docc" isn't a quoted string. Are we not building swift-driver as a package in swift-ci anywhere? /CC @shahmishal

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixing in #782

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants