SE-0110 Status Deferred #726
Conversation
| * Authors: Vladimir S., [Austin Zheng](https://github.com/austinzheng) | ||
| * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner), [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor) | ||
| * Status: **Implemented (Swift 4 beta)**, **Reverted (Swift 4)** | ||
| * Decision Notes: [Implementation Rationale](https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution-announce/2016-July/000215.html), [Reversion Rationale](https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution-announce/2017-June/000386.html) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only a portion of SE-0110 was rolled back in swiftlang/swift#10027 and swiftlang/swift#10414, so you might want to change to:
-* Status: **Implemented (Swift 4 beta)**, **Reverted (Swift 4)**
-* Decision Notes: [Implementation Rationale](https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution-announce/2016-July/000215.html), [Reversion Rationale](https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution-announce/2017-June/000386.html)
+* Status: **Deferred**
+* Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution-announce/2016-July/000215.html), [Additional Commentary](https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution-announce/2017-June/000386.html)A status from process.md is required, so that the proposal appears on the status page. I don't know if the status page can handle more than one review manager.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if only one review manager possible, I suggest we keep the active one (Doug Gregor)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know if the status page can handle more than one review manager.
It can't. Do you think it should?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know if the status page can handle more than one review manager.
It can't. Do you think it should?
In this case, I'd keep the original review manager only.
A deferred or rejected proposal will usually have a separate follow-up proposal (with a different review manager).
Would a Partially Implemented status be useful (for SE-0110, SE-0148 and SE-0161)?
|
Thanks, @Coeur. |
No description provided.