Skip to content

Update the RPM spec files to support release/5.6 #80

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 11, 2022
Merged

Conversation

shahmishal
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@shahmishal
Copy link
Member Author

cc: @tachoknight @tomerd @futurejones

As we are getting closer to releasing Swift 5.6, I updated the spec files to include new repos and drop patch file.

@tachoknight Did you get a chance to look into using metadata file for Fedora?

Copy link
Contributor

@tomerd tomerd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool. one question / discussion point re. versioning of .0 releases

@tomerd
Copy link
Contributor

tomerd commented Mar 11, 2022

nice 🚀

@tachoknight
Copy link
Contributor

I tried to build on Fedora 35 with the spec file but there's a couple of issues, one is minor and I created this PR to fix it. The build doesn't currently work with the latest tag (5.6-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2022-03-02-a) so I guess I'll wait till 5.6 is released to make sure it builds.

@shahmishal
Copy link
Member Author

I tried to build on Fedora 35 with the spec file but there's a couple of issues, one is minor and I created this PR to fix it. The build doesn't currently work with the latest tag (5.6-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2022-03-02-a) so I guess I'll wait till 5.6 is released to make sure it builds.

Thank you for the fix!

@shahmishal shahmishal merged commit ce2cdc6 into main Mar 11, 2022
@shahmishal shahmishal deleted the test-swift-5.6 branch March 11, 2022 16:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants