Skip to content

Improve external dependency discovery logic #195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 1, 2016

Conversation

aciidgh
Copy link
Contributor

@aciidgh aciidgh commented Mar 13, 2016

Packages can have few different layouts, the logic to detect if a dep is an external dep was not handling all the cases.


void cool() {
foo();
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very minor thing but this is missing a line break at the end of the file :)

@mxcl
Copy link
Contributor

mxcl commented Mar 14, 2016

Really, we shouldn't be detecting this, we should specify explicitly external deps at a higher level.

@aciidgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

aciidgh commented Mar 14, 2016

Yeah I understand this is a total hack to begin with, I can try fixing it next week.

@aciidgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

aciidgh commented Mar 29, 2016

@mxcl Fixed, Review/CI

@mxcl
Copy link
Contributor

mxcl commented Mar 31, 2016

@swift-ci Please test

@aciidgh
Copy link
Contributor Author

aciidgh commented Mar 31, 2016

fixed the linux failure, thanks @swift-ci 🖖
@mxcl can you rerun CI

@mxcl
Copy link
Contributor

mxcl commented Mar 31, 2016

@swift-ci Please test

@mxcl
Copy link
Contributor

mxcl commented Mar 31, 2016

LGTM, please merge when you're done.

@aciidgh aciidgh merged commit 9a5ead0 into swiftlang:master Apr 1, 2016
@aciidgh aciidgh deleted the patch-23 branch April 1, 2016 02:24
aciidgh pushed a commit to aciidgh/swift-package-manager that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants