[5.9] Revert "missing pinned version" change #6578
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There's an unfortunate interaction here with the resolver precomputation / `LocalPackageContainer` which leads to us rejecting versions as "not available" if they don't happen to be the currently checked out version. We need a more hollistic change to resolve this issue which is out of scope for 5.9, so we'll revert this change here. rdar://107895012
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
tomerd
approved these changes
May 18, 2023
AndrewHoos
approved these changes
May 18, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's an unfortunate interaction here with the resolver precomputation /
LocalPackageContainerwhich leads to us rejecting versions as "not available" if they don't happen to be the currently checked out version. We need a more hollistic change to resolve this issue which is out of scope for 5.9, so we'll revert this change here.rdar://107895012