Skip to content

Fix missing from arguments in PackageDependency's comments #6876

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2023

Conversation

bc-lee
Copy link
Contributor

@bc-lee bc-lee commented Sep 7, 2023

.upToNextMajor and .upToNextMinor need a from argument, but it was missing in the comments.

Motivation:

[Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve.]

While I was modifying a Package.swift file, I noticed that the comments for .upToNextMajor and .upToNextMinor were missing the from argument. So, I'd like to fix that.

Modifications:

[Describe the modifications you've done.]

Result:

[After your change, what will change.]

`.upToNextMajor` and `.upToNextMinor` need a `from` argument,
but it was missing in the comments.
Copy link
Contributor

@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great catch, thanks!

@MaxDesiatov
Copy link
Contributor

@swift-ci test

@MaxDesiatov MaxDesiatov merged commit 0752d48 into swiftlang:main Sep 13, 2023
@bc-lee bc-lee deleted the feature/fix-example-comment branch September 13, 2023 19:05
MaxDesiatov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
`.upToNextMajor` and `.upToNextMinor` need a `from` argument, but it was missing in the comments.
MaxDesiatov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
`.upToNextMajor` and `.upToNextMinor` need a `from` argument, but it was missing in the comments.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants