Introduce SyntaxVisitorBase
#133
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nkcsgexi
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2019
This is useful if you intend to have subclasses overriding specific methods of a common base `SyntaxVisitor` class.
akyrtzi
force-pushed
the
syntaxvisitorclass
branch
from
fc72f76 to
ee7123b
Compare
|
@swift-ci Please test |
adevress
pushed a commit
to adevress/swift-syntax
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2024
[NFC] Remove links to Google's style guide in comments.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is useful if you intend to have subclasses overriding specific methods of a common base
SyntaxVisitorclass.It workarounds the issue of not being able to override the default implementations of the protocol (see https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-103).