Store the replacement string in IncrementalEdit
#2527
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@swift-ci Please test |
bnbarham
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2024
|
@swift-ci Please test macOS |
Matejkob
reviewed
Mar 6, 2024
IIRC the main reason that `IncrementalEdit` didn’t contain the replacement string was that the edits needed to be transferred over XPC at some point and transferring strings over XPC is always a little tricky. Since the actual contents weren’t actually needed, the actual contents weren’t actually needed. I would like to use `ConcurrentEdits(fromSequential:)` in SourceKit-LSP and for that I need the actual replacement contents. Instead of rolling our own sequential to concurrent replacement (which is non-trivial), let’s re-use the one in SwiftSyntax.
ahoppen
force-pushed
the
ahoppen/replacement-string-in-incremental-edit
branch
from
94a64f8 to
6cf8188
Compare
|
@swift-ci Please test |
|
@swift-ci Please test Windows |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
IIRC the main reason that
IncrementalEditdidn’t contain the replacement string was that the edits needed to be transferred over XPC at some point and transferring strings over XPC is always a little tricky. Since the actual contents weren’t actually needed, the actual contents weren’t actually needed.I would like to use
ConcurrentEdits(fromSequential:)in SourceKit-LSP and for that I need the actual replacement contents. Instead of rolling our own sequential to concurrent replacement (which is non-trivial), let’s re-use the one in SwiftSyntax.