Skip to content

Add convenience initialiser for MemberAccessExpr #450

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

kimdv
Copy link
Contributor

@kimdv kimdv commented May 24, 2022

From comment: #381 (comment)

To keep this PR focussed, do you think we could pull this change out into a separate PR? Also, I think you’re missing descriptions for the parameters. I think we should either remove the per-parameter documentation altogether or provide descriptions.

@ahoppen the parameters are from the generated init method.
I think the best would be to actually add them in the gyb files, to have documentation.

Removed them here.

@kimdv kimdv requested a review from ahoppen as a code owner May 24, 2022 15:36
@kimdv
Copy link
Contributor Author

kimdv commented May 24, 2022

@swift-ci please test

@kimdv kimdv merged commit d22cc0a into swiftlang:main May 24, 2022
@kimdv kimdv deleted the kimdv/add-MemberAccessExprConvenienceInitializers branch December 14, 2022 14:26
adevress pushed a commit to adevress/swift-syntax that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2024
* spelling: abbreviations
* spelling: associated
* spelling: behavior
* spelling: calculated
* spelling: capture
* spelling: combobulator
* spelling: container
* spelling: documentation
* spelling: formatted
* spelling: indices
* spelling: language
* spelling: linted
* spelling: objects
* spelling: omitted
* spelling: parameters
* spelling: preexisting
* spelling: remaining
* spelling: returns
* spelling: sentence
* spelling: successfully
* spelling: types

Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants