-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 441
Add @_objcImplementation attribute #798
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@swift-ci please test |
@CodaFi I'd like your opinion about the test I added in this PR. Is it worth including given that |
@swift-ci please test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, test especially. Thanks for adding it.
Since you're not updating the C++ libSyntax parsing this can be merged independently of the compiler PR whenever you want. |
@CodaFi You’d think so, but it actually breaks the compiler build by introducing references to an |
a71cb0d
to
2688154
Compare
@@ -399,7 +399,11 @@ def __init__(self, name, swift_name=None): | |||
NotSerialized, | |||
ABIBreakingToAdd, ABIBreakingToRemove, APIBreakingToAdd, APIBreakingToRemove, | |||
code=71), | |||
# NOTE: 72 is unused |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a vague memory of reading somewhere that it’s unsafe to reuse old codes but can’t find it anymore. @CodaFi do you remember readings something of the sort when migrating AttributeKinds.py
from the compiler repository?
Part of swiftlang/swift#60630, but safe to merge before the compiler-side implementation.
2688154
to
ae622f9
Compare
@swift-ci please test |
Part of swiftlang/swift#60630,
but safe to merge before the compiler-side implementation.