Skip to content

[mandatory-inline] Add a note about the weird behavior where II later in Mandatory inlining may no longer be the original apply. #11856

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor

[mandatory-inline] Add a note about the weird behavior where II later in Mandatory inlining may no longer be the original apply.

This is one reason for the weird iteration maintainance code in
MandatoryInlining. This comment at least makes it clear what is going on (more
for historical purposes, since I am hoping to fix this soon).

rdar://31521023

… in Mandatory inlining may no longer be the original apply.

This is one reason for the weird iteration maintainance code in
MandatoryInlining. This comment at least makes it clear what is going on (more
for historical purposes, since I am hoping to fix this soon).

rdar://31521023
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test and merge

@swift-ci swift-ci merged commit cc9e8a6 into swiftlang:master Sep 11, 2017
@gottesmm gottesmm deleted the pr-7dd024ba65ad7cdb4b8c0a955135af92e3368d6a branch November 24, 2017 22:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants