KeyPath: Fix out-of-bounds access when instantiating keypaths with optional chaining components. #12725
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tional chaining components. When we pre-scan the components of a key path pattern to determine its runtime type and instance size, we would short-circuit upon seeing an optional-chaining component, since that makes a key path definitely read-only, but the loop also accumulates the size of the instance we're supposed to allocate, so…bad stuff happened. Leave out the short-circuit, fixing SR-6096 | rdar://problem/34889333 .
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test |
|
@swift-ci Please test source compatibility |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When we pre-scan the components of a key path pattern to determine its runtime type and instance size, we would short-circuit upon seeing an optional-chaining component, since that makes a key path definitely read-only, but the loop also accumulates the size of the instance we're supposed to allocate, so…bad stuff happened. Leave out the short-circuit, fixing SR-6096 | rdar://problem/34889333 .