Skip to content

[+0-all-arguments] Use SILGenBuilder APIs to ensure we put cleanups o… #14650

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor

…n the case result instead of on the cast argument.

Otherwise, we break SILGen tests when they are updated for +0. This breakage
occurs since we use the original cleanup from args[0] instead of forwarding that
cleanup and creating a new cleanup on the result.

rdar://34222540

…n the case result instead of on the cast argument.

Otherwise, we break SILGen tests when they are updated for +0. This breakage
occurs since we use the original cleanup from args[0] instead of forwarding that
cleanup and creating a new cleanup on the result.

rdar://34222540
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test and merge

@swift-ci swift-ci merged commit 1a08342 into swiftlang:master Feb 15, 2018
@gottesmm gottesmm deleted the pr-3ee39de175e9315f1e1b2f4d4e679aac451c9050 branch February 15, 2018 00:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants