+0 Guaranteed Arguments #14953
+0 Guaranteed Arguments #14953
Conversation
|
@swift-ci test |
|
@swift-ci smoke benchmark (just for testing purposes) |
|
@swift-ci test source compatibility |
|
@swift-ci smoke benchmark |
|
Forgot to turn on +0 in the runtime... sorry! So now I need to restart everything = (. |
|
@swift-ci test |
|
@swift-ci test source compatibility |
|
@swift-ci test |
|
@swift-ci test source compatibility |
|
@swift-ci smoke benchmark |
|
Build failed |
|
Build failed |
Build comment file:Build failed before running benchmark. |
|
Debugging the swiftpm crash now. |
|
Interesting. It seems to be due to this line in swiftpm: |
|
(the reason why it is interesting is that there is a last runtime fix that I need to look at around subclassing existentials getting wonky and I think the way this code is working, subclass existentials come up, but I need to look further at the SIL. |
|
(i.e. I just reduced the swift test case a bit) |
gottesmm
force-pushed
the
plus-0-final
branch
3 times, most recently
from
2aaf8fe to
44b3ebf
Compare
|
Alright... lets try this again. |
|
@swift-ci test |
|
@swift-ci smoke benchmark |
|
Build failed |
|
Hmm... interesting. I guess I did not resolve the merge conflict perfectly. Lets see. |
|
I figured out the lldb problem in concert with @jimingham. We have changed stepping behavior slightly. I am fixing now. |
|
lldb update PR: apple/swift-lldb#427 |
|
Going to fix the merge conflict and wait for the dust to settle a little from the day now that I hopefully can avoid merge conflicts. |
|
@swift-ci test |
|
Build failed |
rdar://34222540
|
@swift-ci test linux platform |
1 similar comment
|
@swift-ci test linux platform |
|
Build failed |
lldb-dotest does not forward the arguments from DOTEST_EXTRA properly. For now, just build the lldb-dotest target to ensure the cmake build has the right dependencies built. Invoke dotest.py manually as before.
3 similar comments
|
@swift-ci test linux platform |
|
And its done. |
|
awesome! great work! |
This PR contains the final work to convert the compiler to +0. There are still some tests failing, but I would like to get start performing PR testing of the branch.