Skip to content

[+0-all-args] For staging in purposes, add in a lit feature to distin… #15092

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor

@gottesmm gottesmm commented Mar 9, 2018

…guish in between tests that must run with a +0/+1 runtime.

This will enable me to have a small commit to enable +0 and the ability to
easily revert if needed. It makes sense to do this since +0 is a disruptive
change and the number of tests modified is not /that/ big (i.e. ~200).

This shouldn't last for more than a week or two.

rdar://34222540

…guish in between tests that must run with a +0/+1 runtime.

This will enable me to have a small commit to enable +0 and the ability to
easily revert if needed. It makes sense to do this since +0 is a disruptive
change and the number of tests modified is not /that/ big (i.e. ~200).

This shouldn't last for more than a week or two.

rdar://34222540
@gottesmm
Copy link
Contributor Author

gottesmm commented Mar 9, 2018

@swift-ci smoke test and merge

@swift-ci swift-ci merged commit 181595c into swiftlang:master Mar 9, 2018
@gottesmm gottesmm deleted the pr-212da7a86877edbd0d4240e458893d42eba8249b branch March 9, 2018 02:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants