Skip to content

[Batch mode] [rdar://40712614 ] Remove “using batch mode” remark. #17008

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

davidungar
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@davidungar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

@davidungar davidungar requested a review from bob-wilson June 5, 2018 18:22
@davidungar davidungar closed this Jun 6, 2018
@davidungar davidungar reopened this Jun 6, 2018
@davidungar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

@davidungar davidungar requested review from jrose-apple and removed request for bob-wilson June 6, 2018 21:19
@davidungar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jrose-apple At Bob's suggestion, I have pointed this PR in your direction. A simple revert did not work.

@davidungar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

Copy link
Contributor

@jrose-apple jrose-apple left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks in place to me!

@davidungar davidungar merged commit 14ea94a into swiftlang:master Jun 11, 2018
davidungar pushed a commit to davidungar/swift that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2018
…ving-batch-mode-remark

[Batch mode] [rdar://40712614 ] Remove “using batch mode” remark.
davidungar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2018
…batch-remark

Merge pull request #17008 from davidungar/rdar-40712614-removing-batch-mode-remark
@davidungar davidungar deleted the rdar-40712614-removing-batch-mode-remark branch June 20, 2019 21:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants