[Type checker] Make sure we get all conformances for extended nominal types #17562
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… types. Index-while-building ends up querying some conformances that aren’t strictly needed by the type-checker, but which require us to pre-check all conformances for any extension we have. Long-term, this is wasted effort, but for now it eliminates a recent regression caused by the request-evaluator, which (intentionally) tries to perform less work for non-primary files. Fixes rdar://problem/41392714.
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
|
@swift-ci please smoke test and merge |
jrose-apple
approved these changes
Jun 27, 2018
|
@swift-ci please smoke test and merge |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Index-while-building ends up querying some conformances that aren’t
strictly needed by the type-checker, but which require us to pre-check all
conformances for any extension we have. Long-term, this is wasted effort, but
for now it eliminates a recent regression caused by the request-evaluator,
which (intentionally) tries to perform less work for non-primary files.
Fixes rdar://problem/41392714.