Skip to content

Temporarily change to build master-next against swift-5.0-branch of LLVM #18194

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2018

Conversation

bob-wilson
Copy link
Contributor

As Swift 4.2 winds down, we're due to move to a newer version of LLVM.
The swift-5.0-branch in swift-llvm, swift-clang, and swift-compiler-rt
has been updated with content from upstream-with-swift as of last week,
and we're planning to adopt this as our next "stable" branch of LLVM
(forum announcement should be going out soon). There are still some
issues that we need to work through, so to help test that, we're going
to temporarily use the master-next bots to build with those branches.
We'll switch back to testing against upstream-with-swift after we're
done with the transition.

As Swift 4.2 winds down, we're due to move to a newer version of LLVM.
The swift-5.0-branch in swift-llvm, swift-clang, and swift-compiler-rt
has been updated with content from upstream-with-swift as of last week,
and we're planning to adopt this as our next "stable" branch of LLVM
(forum announcement should be going out soon). There are still some
issues that we need to work through, so to help test that, we're going
to temporarily use the master-next bots to build with those branches.
We'll switch back to testing against upstream-with-swift after we're
done with the transition.
@bob-wilson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci smoke test

@bob-wilson bob-wilson merged commit 83e2684 into swiftlang:master Jul 25, 2018
@bob-wilson bob-wilson deleted the master-next-build-config branch July 25, 2018 00:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant