Skip to content

Basic: use new signature for ExecuteNoWait #19056

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 31, 2018
Merged

Conversation

compnerd
Copy link
Member

Adjust the remaining instance of the ExecuteNoWait to use the
llvm::ArrayRef without an implicit conversion. This allows swiftc to
build on Windows once again.

Replace this paragraph with a description of your changes and rationale. Provide links to external references/discussions if appropriate.

Resolves SR-NNNN.

Adjust the remaining instance of the `ExecuteNoWait` to use the
llvm::ArrayRef<StringRef> without an implicit conversion.  This allows swiftc to
build on Windows once again.
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@jrose-apple jrose-apple requested a review from graydon August 29, 2018 20:12
@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test OS X Platform
Git Sha - d425ec1

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - d425ec1

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test MacOS plaform

Copy link
Contributor

@graydon graydon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I had no idea this existed and/or was a problem, but lgtm!

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test Linux Platform
Git Sha - d425ec1

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

@swift-ci please test Linux platform

@compnerd compnerd merged commit 468d9c3 into swiftlang:master Aug 31, 2018
@compnerd compnerd deleted the no-wait branch August 31, 2018 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants