[4.2][NameLookup] Swift 4 compatibility hack for cross-module var overloads in generic type extensions #19223
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
(4.2 cherry-pick of #18488 + expanded test-case for dynamic overload ranking from #18952)
Explanation: Across modules, a property declared in an extension of a generic type would shadow another property declared elsewhere, causing the one in the other module to be inaccessible.
Scope: Resolves a 4.2 source compatibility regression.
SR Issue: SR-7341.
Risk: Moderately low – the added logic is fairly narrow and matches existing compatibility logic in
swift::conflicting
.Testing: Added tests for Swift 4 and 5 cross-module property overloading behaviour, Test suite, Compatibility suite.
Reviewers: @slavapestov, @DougGregor.