-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
[stdlib] Switch ManagedBuffer.header to use _modify #19226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[stdlib] Switch ManagedBuffer.header to use _modify #19226
Conversation
@swift-ci please smoke benchmark |
@swift-ci please test |
Build comment file:Performance: -O
Performance: -Osize
How to read the dataThe tables contain differences in performance which are larger than 8% and differences in code size which are larger than 1%.If you see any unexpected regressions, you should consider fixing the regressions before you merge the PR. Noise: Sometimes the performance results (not code size!) contain false alarms. Unexpected regressions which are marked with '(?)' are probably noise. If you see regressions which you cannot explain you can try to run the benchmarks again. If regressions still show up, please consult with the performance team (@eeckstein). Hardware Overview
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
@swift-ci please smoke test compiler performance |
YOLO! |
Build comment file:Compilation-performance test failed |
@swift-ci please test compiler performance |
Build comment file:Compilation-performance test failed |
@swift-ci please smoke test compiler performance |
@swift-ci please test compiler performance |
Build comment file:Summary for master fullUnexpected test results, excluded stats for RxSwift, ChattoAdditions, Wordy, ReactiveSwift No regressions above thresholds Debug-batchdebug-batch briefRegressed (0)
Improved (0)
Unchanged (delta < 1.0% or delta < 100.0ms) (3)
debug-batch detailedRegressed (0)
Improved (2)
Unchanged (delta < 1.0% or delta < 100.0ms) (92)
Releaserelease briefRegressed (0)
Improved (0)
Unchanged (delta < 1.0% or delta < 100.0ms) (3)
release detailedRegressed (0)
Improved (0)
Unchanged (delta < 1.0% or delta < 100.0ms) (23)
|
I think the wall time regression on the smoke compiler bench was noise. |
First go at trying this with a property rather than a subscript...