[stdlib] Dictionary.updateValue(_:,forKey:): Don’t overwrite the existing key #19500
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
updateValue(_:, forKey:)
currently replaces the old key, which is undocumented, unnecessary and somewhat surprising. The previous incarnation of Dictionary implemented updates this way because of a technical detail; this wrinkle is now eliminated.rdar://problem/32144087
This change is detectable for types where equality is not the same as identity, so this is technically source breaking. Therefore at minimum, this requires a discussion on the fora before landing.
I know of no use cases where the old behavior was actually desirable; most/all practical code that would care about this seem to prefer to leave the old key in place.