[Exclusivity] Support exclusivity checks originating from block arguments #20529
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ents This includes: 1) Not crashing in AccessEnforcementOpts in case we have an Unidentified storage access - rdar://problem/45956642 and rdar://problem/45956777 2) Actually supporting finding the storage locations if we do begin_access <block argument> 3) Test case for said support
|
@swift-ci Please smoke test OS X |
|
Closing - will only merge to master per the new discussion |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This includes:
cherry-pick of #20522 for 5.0 branch per the offline discussion with @AnnaZaks and @atrick