Skip to content

AST: Rework @objcMembers inheritance to not depend on validation order [5.0] #21261

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor

Sema would directly check for the presence of the @objcMembers attribute,
and inherit it from the immediate superclass in validateDecl().

We don't want validateDecl() to have side effects like this and this was
already a problem, because it would not inherit the attribute transitively
in some cases.

Instead, add a ClassDecl::hasObjCMembers() method that walks over all
ancestors and caches the result.

rdar://problem/46420252

Sema would directly check for the presence of the @objcMembers attribute,
and inherit it from the immediate superclass in validateDecl().

We don't want validateDecl() to have side effects like this and this was
already a problem, because it would not inherit the attribute transitively
in some cases.

Instead, add a ClassDecl::hasObjCMembers() method that walks over all
ancestors and caches the result.

<rdar://problem/46420252>
@slavapestov slavapestov requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2018 20:15
@slavapestov slavapestov changed the title AST: Rework @objcMembers inheritance to not depend on validation order AST: Rework @objcMembers inheritance to not depend on validation order [5.0] Dec 12, 2018
@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please test

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please test source compatibility

@slavapestov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AnnaZaks
Copy link
Contributor

Source compat issue is unrelated to this PR.

@AnnaZaks AnnaZaks merged commit b9dc915 into swiftlang:swift-5.0-branch Dec 13, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants