Skip to content

Mark another thorough String test as requiring an optimized stdlib #21835

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2019

Conversation

jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor

This one's taking a pretty long time on simulators, only sometimes making it under the timeout limit.

This one's taking a pretty long time on simulators, only sometimes
making it under the timeout limit.
@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci Please smoke test

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @mikeash

@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

@milseman ping

Copy link
Member

@milseman milseman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jrose-apple jrose-apple merged commit a628d5d into swiftlang:master Jan 15, 2019
@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

jrose-apple commented Jan 15, 2019

Mike, as build czar, do you think this one's important to get over to the 5.0 branch too?

@jrose-apple jrose-apple deleted the the-new-normal branch January 15, 2019 23:37
@benlangmuir
Copy link
Contributor

@jrose-apple Speaking as the current build czar: yes, I think this should get into 5.0.

jrose-apple added a commit to jrose-apple/swift that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2019
…wiftlang#21835)

This one's taking a pretty long time on simulators, only sometimes
making it under the timeout limit.

(cherry picked from commit a628d5d)
@jrose-apple
Copy link
Contributor Author

#22043

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants