[5.0] Always give known-empty class properties a zero offset in the static layout #22739
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@swift-ci Please test. |
|
Build failed |
|
Build failed |
rjmccall
force-pushed
the
empty-field-offset-variables-5.0
branch
from
ab864ed to
b94fa98
Compare
|
@swift-ci Please test. |
|
Build failed |
|
Build failed |
…layout. Field offset vectors are always filled out with either zero or the static layout's offset, depending on the metadata initialization strategy. This change means that the static layout's offset will only be non-zero for properties with a statically-known layout. Existing runtimes doing dynamic class layout assign class properties a zero offset if the field offset vector entry is zero and the property is zero-sized. So this effectively brings the compiler into accord with the runtime (for all newly-compiled Swift code, which will eventually be all Swift code because the current public releases of Swift 5 are not yet considered ABI-stable) and guarantees a zero value for the offset everywhere. Since the runtime will agree with the compiler about the zero value of the offset, the compiler can continue to emit such offset variables as constant. The exception to this rule is if the class has non-fragile ObjC ancestry, in which case the ObjC runtime (which is not aware of this special rule for empty fields) will attempt to slide it along with everything else. Fixes rdar://48031465, in which the `FixedClassMetadataBuilder` for a class with a legacy-fixed layout was writing a non-zero offset for an empty field into the field offset vector, causing the runtime to not apply the special case and thus to compute a non-zero offset, which it then attempted to copy into the global field offset variable, which the compiler had emitted as a true-constant zero.
rjmccall
force-pushed
the
empty-field-offset-variables-5.0
branch
from
b94fa98 to
f9d1129
Compare
|
swift-5.0-branch still requires |
|
@swift-ci Please test. |
|
Build failed |
|
Build failed |
AnnaZaks
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Field offset vectors are always filled out with either zero or the static layout's offset, depending on the metadata initialization strategy. This change means that the static layout's offset will only be non-zero for properties with a statically-known layout. Existing runtimes doing dynamic class layout assign class properties a zero offset if the field offset vector entry is zero and the property is zero-sized. So this effectively brings the compiler into accord with the runtime (for all newly-compiled Swift code, which will eventually be all Swift code because the current public releases of Swift 5 are not yet considered ABI-stable) and guarantees a zero value for the offset everywhere.
Since the runtime will agree with the compiler about the zero value of the offset, the compiler can continue to emit such offset variables as constant. The exception to this rule is if the class has non-fragile ObjC ancestry, in which case the ObjC runtime (which is not aware of this special rule for empty fields) will attempt to slide it along with everything else.
Fixes rdar://48031465, in which the
FixedClassMetadataBuilderfor a class with a legacy-fixed layout was writing a non-zero offset for an empty field into the field offset vector, causing the runtime to not apply the special case and thus to compute a non-zero offset, which it then attempted to copy into the global field offset variable, which the compiler had emitted as a true-constant zero.This is the 5.0 version of #22738. It is not ABI-breaking, although it does establish a stronger ABI invariant that future runtimes (which will be able to assume that all code uses this rule) will be able to take advantage of.