Skip to content

[5.1] [ParseableInterfaces] Stop explicitly optimizing cached modules #23799

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-pick of #23725 onto 5.1

[ParseableInterfaces] Stop explicitly optimizing cached modules
@harlanhaskins harlanhaskins changed the title [ParseableInterfaces] Stop explicitly optimizing cached modules [5.1] [ParseableInterfaces] Stop explicitly optimizing cached modules Apr 4, 2019
@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test and merge

@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

1 similar comment
@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please smoke test

@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

apple/swift-lldb#1465
@swift-ci please smoke test

@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

apple/swift-lldb#1465
@swift-ci please smoke test Linux

1 similar comment
@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

apple/swift-lldb#1465
@swift-ci please smoke test Linux

@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, wait, I need to full test.
@swift-ci please test

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test OS X Platform
Git Sha - 797a6cc

@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Last CI hiccup, hopefully.

@swift-ci please test macOS

@swift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

Build failed
Swift Test OS X Platform
Git Sha - 797a6cc

@harlanhaskins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Last CI hiccup, hopefully.

@swift-ci please test macOS

@harlanhaskins harlanhaskins merged commit a923ba5 into swiftlang:swift-5.1-branch Apr 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants