Property delegates serialization #24512
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Allow one to cache the output for a particular request when it is known a priori, such as when the known result is deserialized.
…operties Serialize the relationship between a property that has an attached delegate and its backing variable, so deserialization can reestablish that link. Fixes rdar://problem/50447022.
…ates Don’t synthesize a missing setter for a property that has an attached delegate and is in a .swiftinterface file.
|
@swift-ci please smoke test and merge |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Serialize the relationship between a property that has an attached delegate
and its backing variable, so deserialization can reestablish that link. While here, fix a bug involving
private(set)properties that have attached delegates when used with textual interfaces.Fixes rdar://problem/50447022.