-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.5k
Storage validation cleanup #26031
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
slavapestov
merged 6 commits into
swiftlang:master
from
slavapestov:storage-validation-cleanup
Jul 12, 2019
Merged
Storage validation cleanup #26031
slavapestov
merged 6 commits into
swiftlang:master
from
slavapestov:storage-validation-cleanup
Jul 12, 2019
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Build failed |
019b3b9
to
0928279
Compare
…ckDecl() finalizeDecl() would kick off certain requests. This was necessary before we had the long-lived type checker to ensure that requests that required a type checker could be completed in time for SILGen. It was also necessary to always emit diagnostics for declarations in primary files. Since we now have a long lived type checker, the first reason is no longer valid, so we can move this work from finalizeDecl() to typeCheckDecl(), where it will run for declarations in primary files only. To ensure that @objc selector conflict diagnostics still get emitted, we also walk the superclass chain and force isObjC() to be computed for each declaration in each superclass.
Also since we're lazier about validating accessors now, relax some checks in the ASTVerifier so that it can tolerate implicit accessors without interface types. All other declarations must still have interface types in verifyChecked(). ASTVerifier: Tolerate implicit accessors without interface types
Validating a variable or subscript no longer forces accessor synthesis.
0928279
to
ecc9e32
Compare
@swift-ci Please smoke test |
@swift-ci Please test source compatibility |
@swift-ci Please test compiler performance |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some smaller but very subtle changes to lay the groundwork for request-based accessor synthesis. Since our test suite doesn't do the best job exercising multi-file type checking I'm mostly sending this out in its current state to run source compat testing.