ReplaceOpaqueTypesWithUnderlyingTypes: We can't look through opaque archetypes if the underlying type contains a type not accessible from the current context #27666
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rchetypes if the underlying type contains a type not accessible from the current context We can't access types in the same module if they are private: they could be in a different TU. We can't access types from different modules if they are private or internal. Some more information can be gleaned from the resilience expansion: A minimally resilient function can't reference private or internal types. rdar://56093964
|
@swift-ci Please test |
|
Build failed |
|
Build failed |
|
@swift-ci Please test |
|
Build failed |
|
Build failed |
|
@swift-ci Please test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We can't access types in the same module if they are private: they could
be in a different TU.
We can't access types from different modules if they are private or
internal.
Some more information can be gleaned from the resilience expansion: A
minimally resilient function can't reference private or internal types.
rdar://56093964