Fix getDirectlyInheritedNominalTypeDecls #28546
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
getDirectlyInheritedNominalTypeDecls looks for inherited protocols in two places: the actual inheritance clause of a declaration and the trailing where clause. This works fine for normal declarations, but deserialized protocols that have Self constraints have no trailing where clause and appear to have no super-protocol bounds. This means clients can potentially disagree about the structure of the protocol, and any symbols derived from it. The test case demonstrates this problem directly: We build a hollowed-out SwiftUI preview provider then try to dynamically replace a requirement in a Self-constrained protocol extension. The SwiftUI module sees the where clause, but when we go to deserialize the module in the "Preview" the protocol extension sees the wrong inheritance bounds and mis-mangles the call to Self.view(for:ofType). The fix is to ask the requirement signature for Self requirements that would normally appear on a trailing where clause. Resolves rdar://57150777
|
@swift-ci please test |
DougGregor
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2019
|
Looks like it got killed off because of some re-entrancy problems. Lucky us we have all these requests lying around. |
|
⛵️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
getDirectlyInheritedNominalTypeDeclslooks for inherited protocols in two places: the actual inheritance clause of a declaration and the trailing where clause. This works fine for normal declarations, but deserialized protocols that have Self constraints have no trailing where clause and appear to have no super-protocol bounds. This means clients can potentially disagree about the structure of the protocol, and any symbols derived from it.The test case demonstrates this problem directly: We build a hollowed-out SwiftUI preview provider then try to dynamically replace a requirement in a Self-constrained protocol extension. The SwiftUI module sees the where clause, but when we go to deserialize the module in the "Preview" the protocol extension sees the wrong inheritance bounds and mis-mangles the call to
Self.view(for:ofType:).The fix is to ask the requirement signature for Self requirements that would normally appear on a trailing where clause.
Resolves rdar://57150777