Skip to content

Remove unneeded UndoManager test which inadvertently triggered driver error #29653

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2020

Conversation

owenv
Copy link
Contributor

@owenv owenv commented Feb 5, 2020

This test was inadvertently checking whether the driver diagnosed a lack of input files instead of whether the program typechecked. Discovered while debugging why it failed with swift-driver

@owenv
Copy link
Contributor Author

owenv commented Feb 5, 2020

@swift-ci please smoke test

@owenv
Copy link
Contributor Author

owenv commented Feb 5, 2020

@jckarter I saw you linked to rdar://problem/17755906 in this test, which has something to do with proxy objects. Do you mind taking a look to see if these changes make sense? I'm not sure if this is a worthwhile fix or if I should just delete the test entirely.

@owenv owenv requested a review from jckarter February 5, 2020 05:01
@jckarter
Copy link
Contributor

jckarter commented Feb 5, 2020

We can probably remove this test, since the issue of assigning through AnyObject dynamic dispatch has never been fixed.

@owenv
Copy link
Contributor Author

owenv commented Feb 5, 2020

@jckarter sounds good to me, I'll just delete it then. Thanks for the context!

@owenv
Copy link
Contributor Author

owenv commented Feb 5, 2020

@swift-ci please smoke test

@owenv owenv changed the title Update UndoManager test which inadvertently triggered driver error Remove unneeded UndoManager test which inadvertently triggered driver error Feb 5, 2020
@owenv
Copy link
Contributor Author

owenv commented Feb 11, 2020

@swift-ci smoke test and merge

@swift-ci swift-ci merged commit 518509d into swiftlang:master Feb 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants