[Typechecker] Covariant subscript check must also take into consideration mismatched types #29828
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When we override a settable subscript with a different argument type, the compiler emits an error complaining that the types are not covariant:
The compiler currently emits an error saying
cannot override mutable subscript of type '(Int) -> Int' with covariant type '(String) -> Int'
, but the argument types (Int
andString
) are unrelated.We should make sure that we don't have mismatched types, so we can print the right diagnostics.
Resolves SR-10323