Skip to content

Fix precedencegroup and operator decl lookup #30269

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

hamishknight
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Mar 9, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Mar 9, 2020
@hamishknight hamishknight force-pushed the hello-operator branch 2 times, most recently from ef36934 to c195306 Compare March 10, 2020 03:09
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Mar 10, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Mar 10, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Mar 10, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Mar 10, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Mar 10, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Mar 10, 2020
Query the SourceLookupCache for the operator decls,
and use ModuleDecl::getOperatorDecls to clean up
some code completion logic.

In addition, this commit switches getPrecedenceGroups
over to querying SourceLookupCache.
Use this instead of DeclKind in a few places.
@hamishknight
Copy link
Contributor Author

swiftlang/llvm-project#892

@swift-ci please test

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ class NullablePtr {
template<typename OtherT>
NullablePtr(NullablePtr<OtherT> Other,
typename std::enable_if<
std::is_convertible<OtherT, T>::value,
std::is_convertible<OtherT *, T *>::value,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's split this one out separately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants