Skip to content

WinSDK: further extend the WinSock module #30295

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2020

Conversation

compnerd
Copy link
Member

@compnerd compnerd commented Mar 9, 2020

Add the new afunix.h header to the WinSock module which was introduced
in the 10.0.17134 release.

Replace this paragraph with a description of your changes and rationale. Provide links to external references/discussions if appropriate.

Resolves SR-NNNN.

Add the new `afunix.h` header to the WinSock module which was introduced
in the 10.0.17134 release.
@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

compnerd commented Mar 9, 2020

@swift-ci please smoke test

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

compnerd commented Mar 9, 2020

@swift-ci please test Windows platform

@millenomi
Copy link
Contributor

What does this header provide, and is it backwards-deployable?

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

compnerd commented Mar 9, 2020

@millenomi this provides AF_UNIX socket support. This is not really back-deployable, but, this is when building the module. If you do not use AF_UNIX in your code, then you can back-deploy. That said, we already have the minimal platform SDK at 10.0.17763 and this was introduced in 10.0.17134.

@millenomi
Copy link
Contributor

Got it. We use AF families in a bunch of places, and I was evaluating if we could adopt anything from here in eg SocketPort et al.

@compnerd
Copy link
Member Author

compnerd commented Mar 9, 2020

The JIT regression is unrelated to this change, tracking in #29863.

@compnerd compnerd merged commit ea456f7 into swiftlang:master Mar 9, 2020
@compnerd compnerd deleted the WinSock branch March 9, 2020 20:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants