Skip to content

Revert "[Typechecker] Diagnose key paths with contextual root type but no leading dot" #30328

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2020

Conversation

xedin
Copy link
Contributor

@xedin xedin commented Mar 10, 2020

Reverts #30164

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Mar 10, 2020

@theblixguy Let's revert and go with parser identification of such cases, sounds good?

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Mar 10, 2020

@swift-ci please smoke test

Copy link
Contributor

@dan-zheng dan-zheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you Pavel for proactively reverting to support our use case!

@saeta
Copy link
Contributor

saeta commented Mar 10, 2020

+1 thank you!

@theblixguy
Copy link
Collaborator

Sounds good! I’ll put up a new PR shortly!

@xedin xedin merged commit aa35a50 into master Mar 10, 2020
@xedin xedin deleted the revert-30164-fix/SR-12290 branch March 10, 2020 18:00
@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Mar 10, 2020

No worries, take your time and thank you again!

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Mar 15, 2020

@theblixguy Just wanted to ask you whether you are still interested in working on alternative solution for this?

@theblixguy
Copy link
Collaborator

@xedin Yes, sorry been a little busy in the past few days. I’ll put up a PR for the other approach shortly!

@xedin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xedin commented Mar 16, 2020

@theblixguy No worries, take your time!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants