Skip to content

[Sema] Move @objc-without-Foundation checking to TypeCheckAttr #31379

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

hamishknight
Copy link
Contributor

There doesn't seem to be any reason to delay this diagnostic until after type-checking has finished any more, so run it along with the rest of attribute checking.

@hamishknight hamishknight force-pushed the building-on-a-slightly-better-foundation branch from a31e751 to 6c321b9 Compare April 28, 2020 23:05
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Apr 28, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Apr 28, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Apr 29, 2020
There doesn't seem to be any reason to delay this
diagnostic until after type-checking has finished
any more, so run it along with the rest of
attribute checking.
@hamishknight hamishknight force-pushed the building-on-a-slightly-better-foundation branch from 6c321b9 to beab9f3 Compare April 29, 2020 03:55
@hamishknight
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please test

@hamishknight
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please test source compatibility

@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Apr 29, 2020
@swiftlang swiftlang deleted a comment from swift-ci Apr 29, 2020
@hamishknight
Copy link
Contributor Author

@swift-ci please test source compatibility Debug

@hamishknight hamishknight merged commit 23de169 into swiftlang:master Apr 29, 2020
@hamishknight hamishknight deleted the building-on-a-slightly-better-foundation branch April 29, 2020 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants